Navigating the Methane Reporting Vacuum: How Operators can Maintain Credibility and Transparency in a Post-GHGRP World

With the EPA’s proposed rollback of GHGRP creating a “reporting vacuum,” operators are under growing pressure to maintain credibility, consistency, and comparability across methane reporting frameworks at a time when global import standards are tightening. In this new landscape, reporting accuracy isn’t just a compliance expectation; it’s becoming a core component of market access, investor confidence, and commercial resilience.

To understand how operators are navigating this shift, we spoke with industry leaders Josh Carlisle (BKV Corporation) and Ethan Boor (Camino Natural Resources). They reveal how their teams are safeguarding data quality, managing competing frameworks, and preserving transparency as the U.S. moves into a post‑GHGRP environment.

In this exclusive guide, they break down:

• How the absence of a unified U.S. framework is reshaping credibility and comparability.
• Practical steps operators are taking to maintain high‑quality, defensible data.
• The risks of fragmented standards, and where innovation may fill the gap.
• How international rules like OGMP 2.0 and the EU import standard are influencing U.S. reporting decisions.
• What a future “ideal” methane reporting ecosystem could look like.

Download your copy to understand how your peers are navigating uncertainty and how operators can maintain transparency and trust amid shifting regulatory expectations.