With the U.S. regulatory landscape fluctuating and global market access pressures rising, operators are rethinking how they evaluate methane technology investments. Ongoing shifts to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) and renewed debate around the repeal of the EPA’s 2009 GHG Endangerment Finding have added complexity to domestic compliance signals. At the same time, mounting export requirements in Europe and Asia are raising the bar for methane data that is credible, certifiable, and market-ready.
Securing budget in 2026 is no longer just about meeting regulatory obligations. It’s about protecting uptime, reducing labor intensity, keeping more product in the pipeline, and strengthening access to premium markets. Methane management is being reframed from a compliance cost to an operational performance lever.
To understand how operators are navigating this shift, we spoke with two industry leaders who are actively shaping internal investment strategy and vendor collaboration models, Brian Shpakoff, Environmental Manager (Crescent Energy) and Paul Espenan, Senior Vice President – EHS&R (Diversified Energy). They share how they evaluate methane technology partners, what earns internal buy-in, and why early collaboration with providers is becoming a competitive advantage.
In this exclusive guide, you’ll discover:
Download the full report to explore how leading operators are securing budget, strengthening market access, and building more defensible methane investment strategies in an increasingly uncertain regulatory landscape.